Jump to content

User:Lurker: Difference between revisions

From The Lonely Galaxy Wiki
No edit summary
Replaced content with "{{Category:Stories}}"
Tag: Replaced
Line 1: Line 1:
<span id="outlander"></span>
{{Category:Stories}}
= Outlander =
 
''This article is about the language. For a resident of the Outer Belt<br />
or Moonlitter, see [The Outlands](The Outlands)''
 
<span id="phonology"></span>
== Phonology ==
 
Like all yinrih languages, Outlander possesses a very small phoneme<br />
inventory when analyzed from a human perspective. The language relies<br />
instead on subtle changes in pitch and volume to carry most of the<br />
meaning.
 
It's mostly a CTRL+C, CTRL+V of Commonthroat with the following changes:
 
* Gemination is allowed within morphemes, not just at morpheme boundaries. Yips may not be geminated.
* In addition to short, long, early, and late, there is an overlong timing. Overlong syllables occur in a few restricted environments.
* Two new tone contours: peaking (low high low) and dipping (high low high)
* Two new strength contours: cresting (weak strong weak) and troughing (strong weak strong)
* Overlong syllables may only occur alongside one of these new contours.
 
<span id="vowels"></span>
=== Vowels ===
 
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Phonation
! Tone
! Weak
!
! Strong
!
|-
|
|
| Short
| Long
| Short
| Long
|-
| Whine
| High
| d
| D
| f
| F
|-
|
| Low
| b
| B
| c
| C
|-
| Growl
| High
| j
| J
| k
| K
|-
|
| Low
| g
| G
| h
| H
|-
| Grunt
| High
| n
| N
| p
| P
|-
|
| Low
| l
| L
| m
| M
|}
 
<span id="contour-midpoints"></span>
==== Contour Midpoints ====
 
Sound Symbol
 
-----
 
low a<br />
high e<br />
weak o<br />
strong u
 
<span id="consonants"></span>
==== Consonants ====
 
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Sound
! Symbol
|-
| huff
| q
|-
| chuff
| r
|-
| yip
| s
|}
 
<span id="grammar"></span>
=== Grammar ===
 
Outlander uses a symmetric voice system. Focus is marked by syntax, with<br />
the focus coming first in the sentence. Verbs are marked for the role of<br />
the focus, with actor, object, benefactor, reason, being indicated.<br />
Other possible forms include locative and instrumental.
 
Word order is FVA (focus verb arguments).
 
Order is Actor, Object, Benefactor...?
 
<span id="pronouns"></span>
=== Pronouns ===
 
Much like Spanish or French, Outlander uses a politeness distinction in<br />
its pronouns. This distinction is used in the third person as well as<br />
the second person as is seen in Spanish or French.
 
The Outlander term for this is qghrh /huff, short low strengthening<br />
growl; chuff, short low strong growl/, which means obligation or duty.<br />
It conveys the social relationship between the speaker and the referent<br />
of the pronoun.
 
The lowest form of obligation is transactional. This is the default form<br />
you use when you're not sure what else to use.
 
The next form is the amicable. It's used between friends. In some more<br />
pious corners of Moonlitter, and especially in the indipendent spacer<br />
city-state Wayfarers' Haven, humans are always addressed with amicable<br />
pronouns even in situations where the transactional form would be<br />
appropriate. The transactional/amicable distinction is quickly evolving<br />
into a species distinction.
 
The highest form is the familial, which is used between parents and<br />
their pups and between litter mates. Some groups of very good friends<br />
may use familial pronouns among themselves, but this is not universal.<br />
It usually occurs when friends meet as pups and stay close into<br />
adulthood.
 
It's very important to note that obligation is seen as a reciprocal<br />
relationship. Addressing someone with familial pronouns doesn't jsut<br />
mean &quot;I think of you as family&quot; but also &quot;I expect you to treat me<br />
like family&quot;. Using more familiar pronouns when a less familiar form<br />
is expected is often seen as rude or even vulgar in some contexts,<br />
especially when a customer addresses an employee, or when employees of a<br />
business address one another. It's seen as burdening the listener with<br />
unwelcome obligations or implying a level of closeness that hasn't yet<br />
been earned.
 
<span id="personal-pronouns"></span>
==== Personal Pronouns ====
 
<span id="st-person"></span>
===== 1st person =====
 
Singular Plural Inclusive Plural Exclusive
 
-----
 
lum pan lumq
 
<span id="nd-and-3rd-person"></span>
===== 2nd and 3rd person =====
 
Obligation Person Singular Plural
 
-----
 
Transactional 2nd rb rB<br />
::: 3rd rc rC<br />
Amicable 2nd sg sG<br />
::: 3rd sj sJ<br />
Familial 2nd qm qM<br />
::: 3rd qp qP<br />
Reverential 2nd rgr rgr<br />
::: 3rd rkr rkr
 
<span id="demonstrative-pronouns"></span>
===== Demonstrative Pronouns =====
 
Deixis Singular Plural
 
-----
 
Proximal Lr Lrl<br />
Distal Mr Mrm
 
<span id="nouns"></span>
==== Nouns ====
 
<span id="attributive-and-possessive-postpositions"></span>
===== Attributive and possessive postpositions =====
 
Ooutlander distinguishes possession and attribution. possession is<br />
marked with the postposition n /short high weak grunt/, and attribution<br />
is marked with the attributive postposition g /short low weak growl/. g<br />
covers situations such as composition and association, while n refers<br />
specifically to possession. As a rough rule, you use n whenever English<br />
would use -'s.
 
<pre>  sPL    g  mrrBqqb
  animal ATT healer
  veterinarian
 
  Jh    g  sFb
  grass ATT sea
  steppe
 
  Mr  khqkh n  gqqgh
  that guy  POS tail
  That guy's tail</pre>
Verbs
 
Verbs inflect for the semantic role of the main noun in the clause,<br />
called the focus or the subject. This is different from its syntactic<br />
role. In the English sentence The dog bit the man, the dog is the<br />
syntactic subject and the semantic agent, while the man is the syntactic<br />
object and the semantic patient. In English, we flip this relationship<br />
by using the passive voice. The man was bitten by the dog. Here, The man<br />
is the syntactic subject but the semantic patient. The dog is now an<br />
optional oblique argument syntacticlaly, but it's still the semantic<br />
agent.
 
verb paradigm
 
Focus non past past
 
-----
 
Actor - -qJ<br />
Object -sd -sD<br />
Benefactor -rn -rN<br />
Reason -qln -qLN<br />
Locative -sfb -sFB<br />
Instrumental -rjk -rJK
 
Nonpast Tense Actor Focus
 
<pre>  bfb gkg lpl
  bfb gkg-0    lpl
  pup climb-ACT tree
  The pup climbs the tree</pre>
Past Tense Actor Focus
 
<pre>  bfb gkgqJ  lpl
  bfb gkg-qJ lpl
  pup climb-ACT.P tree
  The pup climbed the tree.
  The pup was climbing the tree.</pre>
Nonpast Tense Object Focus
 
<pre>  lpl gkgsd bfb
  lpl  gkg-sd      bfb
  tree climb-OBJ    pup
  the tree is climbed by the pup.</pre>
Past Tense Object Focus
 
<pre>  lpl gkgsD bfb
  lpl  gkgsD      bfb
  tree climb-OBJ.P pup
  The tree was climbed by the pup.</pre>
Nonpast Tense Benefactor Focus
 
<pre>  lpl gkgrn bfb
  lpl  gkg-rn bfb
  tree climb-BEN.NP pup
  For the tree, the pup climbs [something].</pre>
Past Tense Benefactor Focus
 
<pre>  lpl gkgrN bfb
  lpl  gkg-rN bfb
  tree climb-BEN.P pup
  For the tree, the pup climbed [something]</pre>
The order of arguments
 
I don't think I've mentioned this before, but here's how the different<br />
verb endings change syntax.
 
agent verb-ACT patient benefactor/indirect object patient verb-OBJ agent<br />
benefactor benefactor verb-BEN agent patient cause verb-CAU agent(?)<br />
patient benefactor
 
Marking Uncertainty
 
Outlander marks uncertainty, which covers both interrogatives and a mood<br />
similar to Commonthroat's nonauthoritative.
 
Uncertainty is marked with a particle placed at the beginning of the<br />
sentence, it is a reduplicated and reduced form of the following<br />
syllable, phonologically separate from the following word.
 
The particle consists of the onset consonant, if any, of the following<br />
syllable, followed by a single short plain vowel nearest to the start of<br />
the vowel of the following syllable. Rising strengthening vowels will<br />
become low weak, dipping weakening vowels will become high strong, and<br />
so on. When the following word is already a single short plain syllable,<br />
the particle is a reduplication of the whole word.
 
Etymologically, this particle may have evolved out of a characteristic<br />
stutter when the speaker is unsure of what they're saying.
 
<pre>  rb sPsPqJ lum
  rb    sPsP-qJ    lum
  2sg.TR seek-ACT.P 1sg
  You were looking for me.
 
  rb rb sPsPqJ lum
  rb  rb    sPsP-qJ    lum
  UNC  2sg.TR seek-ACT.P 1sg
  Were you looking for me?
  You were looking for me?
 
  l lum sPsPsD rb?
  l  lum sPsP-sD    rb
  UNC 1sg seek-OBJ.P 2sg.TR
  You were looking for ME?</pre>
Reflexive phrases
 
A reflexive meaning can be given to a noun phrase by using the word beb<br />
/overlong peaking weak whine/ which means self or soul along with the<br />
possessive postposition n.
 
<pre>  rb    n  beb
  2sg.TR POS self
  yourself</pre>
Yip Stems
 
Yips cannot end a syllable, but some words and affixes end in an implied<br />
yip that manifests in different ways when an affix is added.
 
For example the word rgug(s) (mud volcano, geyser) is pronounced and<br />
written rgug when in the singular (which is unfortunately identical to<br />
the word for cloaca, which many pups and pups at heart find amusing.) In<br />
the plural, we would expect *rgugq, but because of the implied yip, the<br />
word takes the form of the plural suffix used for words ending in a<br />
consonant, -ql, yielding rgugqql.
 
So for yip stems, if a following suffix ends in a vowel, the yip is<br />
pronounced. If the suffix begins with a huff or chuff, the huff or chuff<br />
is geminated.
 
Imperatives
 
The imperative is formed with a special imperative pronoun kr /short<br />
high strong growl, chuff/. It is in the 2nd person and does not reflect<br />
obligation or number in either the standard Moonlitter or Partisan<br />
dialects, but the dialect spoken at Pilgrims' Rest, and subsequently at<br />
Wayfarers' Haven, has innovated a plural form krql.
 
<pre>  kr qjK sg n rKGq
  kr    qjK-0    sg      n  rKG-q
  2.IMP wash-ACT 2sg.AMI POS paw-PL
  Wash your paws.</pre>
Verbs in imperative sentences can be in the past tense. In this case<br />
they carry the notion that something should have been done but wasn't.
 
<pre>  kr qjKqJ sg n rKGq
  kr    qjK-qJ    sg      n  rKG-q
  2.IMP wash-ACT.P 2sg.AMI POS paw-PL
  You should have washed your paws.</pre>
Verbs can also be inflected for other focuses besides the actor focus.
 
<pre>  sg n rKGq qjKsd kr
  sg      n  rKG-q  qjK-sd  kr
  2sg.AMI POS paw-PL wash-OBJ 2.IMP
  Your paws must be washed.
  Your paws, wash them.
 
  sg n rKGq qjKsD kr
  sg      n  rKG-q  qjK-sD kr
  2sg.AMI POS paw-PL wash-OBJ 2.IMP
  Your paws should have been washed.
  Your paws, you should have washed them.</pre>
Expressing similes
 
mlem /short low strong grunt; overlong peaking strengthening grunt/<br />
means likeness or image or &quot;something similar to something else&quot;. To<br />
express similes, you follow a noun phrase with g mlem eg mrBqqb g mlem<br />
literally &quot;healer likeness&quot; means &quot;like a healer&quot;.
 
To say &quot;X is like Y&quot; you use the copula sb, which per an earlier<br />
post is actually transitive. It means that the actor is among the set of<br />
entities denoted by the object.
 
<pre>  mqgrrgsdq sb rgugq g mlem
  mqgrrgsd-q sb-0    rgug-q    g  mlem
  opinion-PL COP-ACT cloaca-PL ATT likeness
  Opinions are like Cloacas.</pre>
g mlem may have fossilized into a postpositive that can be appended to<br />
whole sentences and not just noun phrases to simply mean &quot;like&quot;
 
More uses for the attributive postposition
 
The locative focus may be used with time phrases
 
verb-verb compounds
 
expressing inclination or desire
 
You can use the verb qlem to smell like, to feel an emotion in front of<br />
a subordinate verb to mean to be inclined to. Unlike Commonthroat's<br />
serial verb constructions, the second verb is inflected in the<br />
subordinate state.
 
<pre>  lum qlem bqrMr sjGq
  lum qlem-0        SUB-rMr-0  sjGq
  1sg smell_like-ACT bq-eat-ACT fruit
  I smell like eating fruit.</pre>
The verb endings must match (for now).
 
<pre>  sjGq qlemsd bqrMrsd lum
  sjGq  qlem-sd        bq-eat-OBJ 1sg 
  fruit smell_like-OBJ SUB-rMr-sd lum
  It's fruit a smell like eating.
  </pre>
<span class="internal-embed" src="tag&gt;language"></span>

Revision as of 14:42, 1 August 2026

I make no claim to being a master storyteller. You're getting what you pay for. That being said, I hope these stories are at least worth the time it takes to read them.

When I'm not feeling lazy, translated yinrih speech is indicated with Italian quotes («»).

This project takes place over a very long time span. It covers the dawn of the yinrih species around 100 thousand years ago to the present when they make first contact with humanity as well as the following decades as the two species get to know each other. The table below lists the stories in the order I originally posted them on the CBB forum, along with an approximate year (in Earth years before or after First Contact) that the story takes place. Some of the stories are in-universe legends or parables, and thus don't have a date.

Story List (in order of post date)
Story Approximate In-Universe time frame
The House of Friendship 10
The Tornado 0
Are We As Mayflies? 0
The Artificer's Litter -30000
Beating the Heat 0
The Mass Router 1
The Ansible 1
The Spacer Confederacy -300
Mundane Utility 1
First Contact 0
Table Manners 2
The Farspeaker's Apprentice -40000
Everybody Poops Together 10
RTFM -33000
A Parable ?
On the Merits of Pelage 1
The Angel and the Ape 0
Human for a Day (Part 1?) ?
The Story of the Steadtree ?
Art Angst 2
In Which Greg Experiences Indigestion 10
The Uncanny Valley 1
An Alien Through Alien Eyes ?
Meanwhile, in an Alternate Universe ?