Outlander: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
fixed an error introduced when converting from md to mediawiki by Pandoc
 
Line 9: Line 9:
Like all yinrih languages, Outlander possesses a very small phoneme inventory when analyzed from a human perspective. The language relies instead on subtle changes in pitch and volume to carry most of the meaning.
Like all yinrih languages, Outlander possesses a very small phoneme inventory when analyzed from a human perspective. The language relies instead on subtle changes in pitch and volume to carry most of the meaning.


ItΓÇÖs mostly a CTRL+C, CTRL+V of Commonthroat with the following changes:
It's mostly a CTRL+C, CTRL+V of Commonthroat with the following changes:


* Gemination is allowed within morphemes, not just at morpheme boundaries. Yips may not be geminated.
* Gemination is allowed within morphemes, not just at morpheme boundaries. Yips may not be geminated.
Line 120: Line 120:
The Outlander term for this is <code>qghrh</code> /huff, short low strengthening growl; chuff, short low strong growl/, which means ''obligation'' or ''duty''. It conveys the social relationship between the speaker and the referent of the pronoun.
The Outlander term for this is <code>qghrh</code> /huff, short low strengthening growl; chuff, short low strong growl/, which means ''obligation'' or ''duty''. It conveys the social relationship between the speaker and the referent of the pronoun.


The lowest form of obligation is ''transactional''. This is the default form you use when youΓÇÖre not sure what else to use.
The lowest form of obligation is ''transactional''. This is the default form you use when you're not sure what else to use.


The next form is the ''amicable''. ItΓÇÖs used between friends. In some more pious corners of Moonlitter, and especially in the indipendent spacer city-state WayfarersΓÇÖ Haven, humans are always addressed with amicable pronouns even in situations where the transactional form would be appropriate. The transactional/amicable distinction is quickly evolving into a species distinction.
The next form is the ''amicable''. It's used between friends. In some more pious corners of Moonlitter, and especially in the indipendent spacer city-state Wayfarers' Haven, humans are always addressed with amicable pronouns even in situations where the transactional form would be appropriate. The transactional/amicable distinction is quickly evolving into a species distinction.


The highest form is the ''familial'', which is used between parents and their pups and between litter mates. Some groups of very good friends may use familial pronouns among themselves, but this is not universal. It usually occurs when friends meet as pups and stay close into adulthood.
The highest form is the ''familial'', which is used between parents and their pups and between litter mates. Some groups of very good friends may use familial pronouns among themselves, but this is not universal. It usually occurs when friends meet as pups and stay close into adulthood.


ItΓÇÖs very important to note that obligation is seen as a reciprocal relationship. Addressing someone with familial pronouns doesnΓÇÖt jsut mean ΓÇ£I think of you as familyΓÇ¥ but also ΓÇ£I expect you to treat me like familyΓÇ¥. Using more familiar pronouns when a less familiar form is expected is often seen as rude or even vulgar in some contexts, especially when a customer addresses an employee, or when employees of a business address one another. ItΓÇÖs seen as burdening the listener with unwelcome obligations or implying a level of closeness that hasnΓÇÖt yet been earned.
It's very important to note that obligation is seen as a reciprocal relationship. Addressing someone with familial pronouns doesn't jsut mean ΓÇ£I think of you as familyΓÇ¥ but also ΓÇ£I expect you to treat me like familyΓÇ¥. Using more familiar pronouns when a less familiar form is expected is often seen as rude or even vulgar in some contexts, especially when a customer addresses an employee, or when employees of a business address one another. It's seen as burdening the listener with unwelcome obligations or implying a level of closeness that hasn't yet been earned.


<span id="personal-pronouns"></span>
<span id="personal-pronouns"></span>
Line 244: Line 244:
=== Attributive and possessive postpositions. ===
=== Attributive and possessive postpositions. ===


Ooutlander distinguishes possession and attribution. possession is marked with the postposition <code>n</code> /short high weak grunt/, and attribution is marked with the attributive postposition <code>g</code> /short low weak growl/. <code>g</code> covers situations such as composition and association, while <code>n</code> refers specifically to possession. As a rough rule, you use <code>n</code> whenever English would use -ΓÇÖs.
Ooutlander distinguishes possession and attribution. possession is marked with the postposition <code>n</code> /short high weak grunt/, and attribution is marked with the attributive postposition <code>g</code> /short low weak growl/. <code>g</code> covers situations such as composition and association, while <code>n</code> refers specifically to possession. As a rough rule, you use <code>n</code> whenever English would use -'s.


<pre>sPL    g  mrrBqqb
<pre>sPL    g  mrrBqqb
Line 260: Line 260:
== Verbs ==
== Verbs ==


Verbs inflect for the semantic role of the main noun in the clause, called the focus or the subject. This is different from its syntactic role. In the English sentence ''The dog bit the man'', the dog is the syntactic subject and the semantic agent, while the man is the syntactic object and the semantic patient. In English, we flip this relationship by using the passive voice. ''The man was bitten by the dog''. Here, The man is the syntactic subject but the semantic patient. The dog is now an optional oblique argument syntacticlaly, but itΓÇÖs still the semantic agent.
Verbs inflect for the semantic role of the main noun in the clause, called the focus or the subject. This is different from its syntactic role. In the English sentence ''The dog bit the man'', the dog is the syntactic subject and the semantic agent, while the man is the syntactic object and the semantic patient. In English, we flip this relationship by using the passive voice. ''The man was bitten by the dog''. Here, The man is the syntactic subject but the semantic patient. The dog is now an optional oblique argument syntacticlaly, but it's still the semantic agent.


<span id="verb-paradigm"></span>
<span id="verb-paradigm"></span>
Line 342: Line 342:
= The order of arguments =
= The order of arguments =


I donΓÇÖt think IΓÇÖve mentioned this before, but hereΓÇÖs how the different verb endings change syntax.
I don't think I've mentioned this before, but here's how the different verb endings change syntax.


agent verb-ACT patient benefactor/indirect object patient verb-OBJ agent benefactor benefactor verb-BEN agent patient cause verb-CAU agent(?) patient benefactor
agent verb-ACT patient benefactor/indirect object patient verb-OBJ agent benefactor benefactor verb-BEN agent patient cause verb-CAU agent(?) patient benefactor
Line 349: Line 349:
= Marking Uncertainty =
= Marking Uncertainty =


Outlander marks uncertainty, which covers both interrogatives and a mood similar to CommonthroatΓÇÖs nonauthoritative.
Outlander marks uncertainty, which covers both interrogatives and a mood similar to Commonthroat's nonauthoritative.


Uncertainty is marked with a particle placed at the beginning of the sentence, it is a reduplicated and reduced form of the following syllable, phonologically separate from the following word.
Uncertainty is marked with a particle placed at the beginning of the sentence, it is a reduplicated and reduced form of the following syllable, phonologically separate from the following word.
Line 355: Line 355:
The particle consists of the onset consonant, if any, of the following syllable, followed by a single short plain vowel nearest to the start of the vowel of the following syllable. Rising strengthening vowels will become low weak, dipping weakening vowels will become high strong, and so on. When the following word is already a single short plain syllable, the particle is a reduplication of the whole word.
The particle consists of the onset consonant, if any, of the following syllable, followed by a single short plain vowel nearest to the start of the vowel of the following syllable. Rising strengthening vowels will become low weak, dipping weakening vowels will become high strong, and so on. When the following word is already a single short plain syllable, the particle is a reduplication of the whole word.


Etymologically, this particle may have evolved out of a characteristic stutter when the speaker is unsure of what theyΓÇÖre saying.
Etymologically, this particle may have evolved out of a characteristic stutter when the speaker is unsure of what they're saying.


<pre>rb sPsPqJ lum
<pre>rb sPsPqJ lum
Line 390: Line 390:
= Imperatives =
= Imperatives =


The imperative is formed with a special imperative pronoun kr /short high strong growl, chuff/. It is in the 2nd person and does not reflect obligation or number in either the standard Moonlitter or Partisan dialects, but the dialect spoken at PilgrimsΓÇÖ Rest, and subsequently at WayfarersΓÇÖ Haven, has innovated a plural form <code>krql</code>.
The imperative is formed with a special imperative pronoun kr /short high strong growl, chuff/. It is in the 2nd person and does not reflect obligation or number in either the standard Moonlitter or Partisan dialects, but the dialect spoken at Pilgrims' Rest, and subsequently at Wayfarers' Haven, has innovated a plural form <code>krql</code>.


<pre>kr qjK sg n rKGq
<pre>kr qjK sg n rKGq
Line 396: Line 396:
2.IMP wash-ACT 2sg.AMI POS paw-PL
2.IMP wash-ACT 2sg.AMI POS paw-PL
Wash your paws.</pre>
Wash your paws.</pre>
Verbs in imperative sentences can be in the past tense. In this case they carry the notion that something should have been done but wasnΓÇÖt.
Verbs in imperative sentences can be in the past tense. In this case they carry the notion that something should have been done but wasn't.


<pre>kr qjKqJ sg n rKGq
<pre>kr qjKqJ sg n rKGq
Line 444: Line 444:
== expressing inclination or desire ==
== expressing inclination or desire ==


You can use the verb <code>qlem</code> ''to smell like, to feel an emotion'' in front of a subordinate verb to mean ''to be inclined to''. Unlike CommonthroatΓÇÖs serial verb constructions, the second verb is inflected in the subordinate state.
You can use the verb <code>qlem</code> ''to smell like, to feel an emotion'' in front of a subordinate verb to mean ''to be inclined to''. Unlike Commonthroat's serial verb constructions, the second verb is inflected in the subordinate state.


<pre>lum qlem bqrMr sjGq
<pre>lum qlem bqrMr sjGq